Unlike Disney’s 1999 Tarzan (which was four years away), the 1995 piece refuses to let Tarzan become fully civilized. His refusal to wear clothes or speak English is presented as moral superiority. Jane’s shame is that she loves him because he is not like her—a colonial desire she can never resolve.
This paper uses close textual analysis, comparative genre reading, and cultural-historical contextualization. Primary texts include canonical Tarzan materials (selected novels and film adaptations up to the mid-1990s) and feminist critiques circulating around 1990–1996. Secondary sources are drawn from cultural studies on postcolonial theory, gender performativity, and spectacle studies. tarzanxshameofjane1995engl work
: The film gained significant attention when the estate of Edgar Rice Burroughs attempted to sue the production; however, the lawsuit ultimately failed. Unlike Disney’s 1999 Tarzan (which was four years
Today, exists only as a phantom keyword. It has never been archived by the OTW (Organization for Transformative Works). No known physical fanzine from 1995 contains it. However, the search query itself suggests a dedicated fan (or student) trying to relocate their youth. This paper uses close textual analysis, comparative genre
Below is an overview of the production, its historical context, and its legacy in the world of adult animation. The Origin and Context of Tarzan-X (1995)
If you are the person who wrote this, or if you remember reading it, here are technical steps:
No ISBN, no Library of Congress entry, no WorldCat record. 1995 indie works were often printed in runs of <100 copies and never digitized. The title may survive only as a rumor on ancient Geocities archives or BBS text files. Alternatively, it might be a confused memory of Tarzan: The Lost Adventure (1995, novel) or The Return of Tarzan comics from DC’s Tarzan series (1970s).