The book asks a deceptively simple question: Is it physical (ink on paper)? Ideal (a Platonic form)? Psychological (the author’s or reader’s thoughts)? Ingarden rejects all three, proposing instead a purely intentional object —a structure that depends on conscious acts but is not reducible to them.
When you read, you unconsciously those gaps. You decide (or the text guides you) that Anna’s eyes are “deep” and “dark,” but you may imagine them as brown, gray, or green. This act of filling-in is what Ingarden calls concretization . roman ingarden the literary work of art pdf
This includes the sounds of words, rhythms, and phonetic patterns that serve as the physical foundation for the work. The book asks a deceptively simple question: Is
The Concretization of the Literary Work of Art - Semantic Scholar roman ingarden the literary work of art pdf